[HoI3] 2D or 3D ?

gepard schrieb:

king cobra schrieb: You should make a poll. helmi_floet

yes, you are correctly. a poll is better to notice. :guck:

Glad to help out. helmi_baeh

gepard schrieb: i vote for 3. map in 2d, and sprites in 3d like now perhaps.
and a biiiig landscape. helmi_hihi

it gives many games, which show that. 2d looks more realistic and detailed and sharpener. :guck:

I completely agree, they may not be as flashy to look at, but give you the information you need in an easy to understand layout, without slowing down you computer.

gepard schrieb: perfect!!!!!! flashy. ( i notice this word in my noticebook )

thats my arguments. i say exactly this ever and ever. :guck: helmi_baeh

normalos_hehehehe normalos_hehehehe normalos_hehehehe

P.S. is the word your looking for 'over', instead of ever? helmi_floet

The look of teh game is a problem, all of the improvemnets made by players make the game 100% better.

3D is not needed for such a game, I would prefer a game that actually is TESTED AND WORKS.

Paradox often, shall we say, 'streches the truth' about how the games are play tested. Three times I have reviewed their games and found obvious bugs in my FIRST playing because nobody bothered to test the nations I selected to play.

Those three were:

Crusader Kings: Nobody bothered to play the first scenario all the way to teh end, there was a huge bug in that the Mongols could not be defeated unless the two mongol tribes went to war againt one another, which happened about 99% of the time.

Victoria: The Italian unifacation did not work in the 1836 scenario, a major world event simply could not happen.

HoI 2: The turorial was broken, you could not win the instructed battle.

Knowing this, liem everyone else, I have no faith in paradox producing aplayable game out of the box, it ALWAYS needs a patch.

FFZ schrieb: 3D is not needed for such a game, I would prefer a game that actually is TESTED AND WORKS.

This point is brought home by the disappointing EU3. Just thinking how much juice is wasted on a sub-par 3d interface makes me sick. :kotzen:

EU 3 failed for a simple and obvious reason.

Why do we play historical games?

We like history.

They made EU 3 into a FANTASY game, where you could be some forgotten baltic state and take over the world.

It would be like Tannu Tuva taking over the world in HoI, rediculous!

Gepard wrote:

but for hoi3 i have no hope. the charm is over.

I hope Paradox learn from their mistakes with EU3 and read forums like ours to see what modders and gamers think.

If Paradox make HOI3 like EU3 we won't have guys like you making such great mods!

:-( :-(

I'm hoping they streamline things enough so I can try my ultimate ambition, starting a game of Crusader kings and playing the same nation and save though EU3, Victoria and finally doomsday.

Now THAT would be some AAR!

So we know...3d, but it looks very fine?!